<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defensive End Technique:  Which is Best?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.football-defense.com/defensive-end-technique-which-is-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.football-defense.com/defensive-end-technique-which-is-best/</link>
	<description>Teaching Defense to Football Coaches who want to Dominate on the Field</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Milbank</title>
		<link>http://www.football-defense.com/defensive-end-technique-which-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-9926</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Milbank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 22:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-defense.com/?p=238#comment-9926</guid>
		<description>In our scheme, were we have an even front (4-3, 4-4), the DE to the TE side will align just off head-to-head with the Tackle (it&#039;s more a shade than the full tech). On the weak side (presuming it&#039;s not a two-TE set), the DE will align head to head, but will shift pre-snap depending on what the offense&#039;s weight is (more backs/receivers to one side or the other -- we don&#039;t count those directly behind center ... QB, RBs in straight I, etc.). If weak-side DE is on the weighted side, he will shift pre-snap to gain a slight outside shade on the Tackle.

In all cases, their line of attack will take them to the B gap (unless it&#039;s a called stunt). That&#039;s what we do, be blow up B to B. We don&#039;t think they are fast enough to get to our C gaps. Even if it is the RB&#039;s landing spot, with the DE sealing B we have the OLB to force (moving up to force the RB to commit to the inside or outside), with help from the CB to help maintain the outside contain. if the RB commits to cutback, the DE and ILB are there to prevent that. And lastly, the other LBs are in pursuit mode by this point, as well getting a run-stop commit by the FS.

Since the LBs are keying on gap-to-key (F or H backs), we can pretty much run-blitz favorably, and force the RB to make a landing zone commit prior to reaching the LoS.

On the TE side, the DE is heading up-field with a tight inside leverage of the Tackle. Even if the RB is already beyond him (headed for C or D), he has backside seal for B/C. The ILB to the TE side has C, but he is reading through the B to his backfield key (formation dependent).  If ball-on (the RB is not yet to his outside), he will blow to the C inside the TE while the S is wide, forcing the TE to commit inside or out. Meanwhile, the NT is blowing up strong A. Since the MLB (or offside ILB in 4-LB packages instead of our 5-package) is ball-off, he his taking a pursuit role down the LoS as long as the RB has not yet crossed the LoS. If the RB cuts back, the MLB will make the force, with the others converging (pursuit) and sealing.

This varies during the course of a game, as I get input from the D-line and LBs about the offense&#039;s tendencies and strengths/weaknesses. If necessary, we&#039;ll shift from our default alignment to more heavily favor the offense&#039;s weighted side, and even use stunt/bltiz packages to exploit the T/TE on the strong side.

After that long-winded explanation ... the basic rule for the DEs is get penetration into the B, his technique or shading notwithstanding (as that&#039;s governed largely by the offense&#039;s formation and weight), it is his explosiveness into the B that is all-important. How he is engaged by the O-line will determine the run-pass blitz combo that will force/seal the RB.

Because of our LB keys and our roles based on ball-on or ball-off, this prevents susceptibility to draws, counters and misdirection (reverses, etc.). Since we run- and pass-blitz every play, it also takes play action away from the offense. In fact, draws and play-action style plays play into our blitz scheme, ditto for middle screens. In fact, having an aggressive attack-oriented philosophy generally makes plays that take time to develop very counter-productive for the offense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our scheme, were we have an even front (4-3, 4-4), the DE to the TE side will align just off head-to-head with the Tackle (it&#8217;s more a shade than the full tech). On the weak side (presuming it&#8217;s not a two-TE set), the DE will align head to head, but will shift pre-snap depending on what the offense&#8217;s weight is (more backs/receivers to one side or the other &#8212; we don&#8217;t count those directly behind center &#8230; QB, RBs in straight I, etc.). If weak-side DE is on the weighted side, he will shift pre-snap to gain a slight outside shade on the Tackle.</p>
<p>In all cases, their line of attack will take them to the B gap (unless it&#8217;s a called stunt). That&#8217;s what we do, be blow up B to B. We don&#8217;t think they are fast enough to get to our C gaps. Even if it is the RB&#8217;s landing spot, with the DE sealing B we have the OLB to force (moving up to force the RB to commit to the inside or outside), with help from the CB to help maintain the outside contain. if the RB commits to cutback, the DE and ILB are there to prevent that. And lastly, the other LBs are in pursuit mode by this point, as well getting a run-stop commit by the FS.</p>
<p>Since the LBs are keying on gap-to-key (F or H backs), we can pretty much run-blitz favorably, and force the RB to make a landing zone commit prior to reaching the LoS.</p>
<p>On the TE side, the DE is heading up-field with a tight inside leverage of the Tackle. Even if the RB is already beyond him (headed for C or D), he has backside seal for B/C. The ILB to the TE side has C, but he is reading through the B to his backfield key (formation dependent).  If ball-on (the RB is not yet to his outside), he will blow to the C inside the TE while the S is wide, forcing the TE to commit inside or out. Meanwhile, the NT is blowing up strong A. Since the MLB (or offside ILB in 4-LB packages instead of our 5-package) is ball-off, he his taking a pursuit role down the LoS as long as the RB has not yet crossed the LoS. If the RB cuts back, the MLB will make the force, with the others converging (pursuit) and sealing.</p>
<p>This varies during the course of a game, as I get input from the D-line and LBs about the offense&#8217;s tendencies and strengths/weaknesses. If necessary, we&#8217;ll shift from our default alignment to more heavily favor the offense&#8217;s weighted side, and even use stunt/bltiz packages to exploit the T/TE on the strong side.</p>
<p>After that long-winded explanation &#8230; the basic rule for the DEs is get penetration into the B, his technique or shading notwithstanding (as that&#8217;s governed largely by the offense&#8217;s formation and weight), it is his explosiveness into the B that is all-important. How he is engaged by the O-line will determine the run-pass blitz combo that will force/seal the RB.</p>
<p>Because of our LB keys and our roles based on ball-on or ball-off, this prevents susceptibility to draws, counters and misdirection (reverses, etc.). Since we run- and pass-blitz every play, it also takes play action away from the offense. In fact, draws and play-action style plays play into our blitz scheme, ditto for middle screens. In fact, having an aggressive attack-oriented philosophy generally makes plays that take time to develop very counter-productive for the offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Seay</title>
		<link>http://www.football-defense.com/defensive-end-technique-which-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Seay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.football-defense.com/?p=238#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Coach:  This is great stuff!  You&#039;ve helped me codify my thinking on DE techqniues, and I love the way you tie the technique into the larger contecxt of the defense in use -- it doesn&#039;t make any sense to play an End with D gap responsibility in a 7, now does it?  Yet most &quot;experts&quot; don&#039;t pass on that kind of info along to coaches who are trying to learn more about defense.

Again, great job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coach:  This is great stuff!  You&#8217;ve helped me codify my thinking on DE techqniues, and I love the way you tie the technique into the larger contecxt of the defense in use &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t make any sense to play an End with D gap responsibility in a 7, now does it?  Yet most &#8220;experts&#8221; don&#8217;t pass on that kind of info along to coaches who are trying to learn more about defense.</p>
<p>Again, great job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

